[Rpm-metadata] package and file colors
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Wed Sep 3 18:34:43 EDT 2003
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:29, Mark Hatle wrote:
> I bring this up because of the ramifications with dependencies. I'm
> very much knew to the metadata/file coloring.. so I could be outside of
> what is expected. However, if you have an o32 app, it needs to require
> o32 libraries (APIs) etc. Same w/ n32.
> So if this is a rat hole ignore it.. I just wanted to make sure the
> issue of multiple binaries for the same system, w/o a clear 32/64
> division were considered.
It's not that it isn't a point for discussion - it's just that it isn't
really relevant here.
The work for dependencies, etc, has to be done on the client side.
The metadata in the repo won't be calculating dependencies, just listing
More information about the Rpm-metadata